eta 2892a2

[hannover_dk]

Jeg tror, hvis du læser den, at du vil se at det jo er en sammenligning mellem 2892 og rolex 3135 (og en del andre)- hvor man langt hen ad vejen væver lidt rundt, men konkluder at han mener 2892 eller Omega 1120 naturligt nok endnu mere - vinder.

Han kommer også ind på en del andre i sammenligningen når han skriver om 2892 i det som kommer først i google søgning 2892a2

http://www.pmwf.com/cgi-bin/ForumArchive...ead=443964

Du og andre har det vigtigste her som jeg læser det:

So how does it compare to the competition? There are some movements that match it in terms of accuracy and reliability, but in my humble opinion, none exceed it. The Rolex 3035 and 3135 match it toe to toe. But they are a lot thicker and considerably more expensive too. The PPs, while being very pretty to look at, do not match it for accuracy and are more delicate as far as reliability is concerned. Of course they’re also slightly thinner, so that does put them at a disadvantage. The JLC 889/2 does match it for accuracy, but is also too delicate to give it any competition in the reliability department. The main reason for the latter is its very weak mainspring. The whole design, while being well thought out and superbly executed, relies too much on everything being just perfect. It is just thrown out of wack too easily, when even minor things go out of adjustment. I don’t have too much experience on the Blancpain/Piguet movements. But from the few that have crossed my bench, they don’t seem to deliver the same accuracy that the 2892 has no trouble delivering."