31-10-2010, 01:57 PM
@Hannover - Jeg måtte lige omkring Loncar's side: "The Speedmaster Professional bracelet & strap guide", for at gå det hersens original (blik)lænke efter i sømmene
Det tog godt nok (kun) 4 år for mig, at blive enig med mig selv om, at Flightmasterens originale 1171 faktisk ligner ubehjælpsom metalsløjd, og at en "mesh" kunne bidrage væsentligt til en positiv oplevelse af en "Flighty".
I trådens eksempel ser PO'en flot og helstøbt ud på den sorte rem.
Med venlig hilsen - Geodoc
Citat:The first Speedmaster Pro bracelet was the ref.1039. It had some sort of mechanism at the last few linksJeg er helt enig med dig om, at "original (blik)lænke" ofte skal "nydes" med en vis grad af overbærenhed, til trods for artiklens udtalte: "... to 'restore' your vintage Omega Speedmaster Professional."
near the clasp that could extend the bracelet a bit. A sort of fix-o-flex effect. Most of these bracelets are
gone, and that will become logical when you hold of these old bracelets on your hand. They are not very
solid and they don't make a very good impression qualitywise.
When Omega introduced the Speedmaster Professional with cal.861 (the successor of the cal.321
columnwheel movement) they also introduced a new bracelet. The ref.1171, which was more solid than
the ref.1039 and was more durable too. The ref.1171 can still be ordered at Omega in Switzerland to
'restore' your vintage Omega Speedmaster Professional.
Det tog godt nok (kun) 4 år for mig, at blive enig med mig selv om, at Flightmasterens originale 1171 faktisk ligner ubehjælpsom metalsløjd, og at en "mesh" kunne bidrage væsentligt til en positiv oplevelse af en "Flighty".
I trådens eksempel ser PO'en flot og helstøbt ud på den sorte rem.
Med venlig hilsen - Geodoc

![[-]](https://urdebatten.dk/images/collapse.png)