Sub vs GMT II vs Explorer II

[willy]

(29-02-2016, 12:23 AM)Sub-erman Skrev: Fancy, way too busy, dress/sports watch


/SK

I think the opposite,the moving bezel on the sub is far more likly to get damaged than the solid chunk of metal on the Explorer.The Explorer is designed to be knocked around on the walls of caves or mountains.It has not the weakness of the sub.And its dial is only more busy than the sub because of the GMT function.Not that i am saying the Sub is weak,because it is most definitely not.But i think the Explorer is actually a stronger built watch.But i will admit it is a better dress watch than the Sub